[jaimehlers]

You have no idea how easy it would be for me to be extremely scornful of your claim of innocence, Katt. So instead (in the interests of not starting a "yes you did/no I didn't" argument), I'll go for a dry recitation of events. Yours was the first comment in that thread, in which you said you couldn't have told that it was a TG pic. His response was that it was a character from a video game and should have been obvious.

Your response after that was that it was out of proportion and that you couldn't really tell what the proportions were. Things continued in this vein for several more posts before Quarma got fed up and snapped at you, which of course ensured that the argument continued for the better part of three pages.

The point is, regardless of what responsibility Quarma might bear for what happened in that thread, you bear quite a bit of responsibility for it yourself. Fault does not imply that only one person was responsible, and in fact more than one person can and usually does bear fault for an argument or incident.

If you want to bring up the lack of an age warning to Lorekeep, that's fine and I'd suggest you do so. But even with an age warning, that's still beside the point. It just absolves the site of responsibility, but it won't stop minors from visiting anyway, regardless of whatever warnings might be put up. I believe the saying about "youthful folly" applies here.

Be that as it may, not everyone moves out of their parents' home when they're eighteen. And even if someone has a private computer of their own, that doesn't necessarily mean that they have complete privacy. Should they thus never visit a site like this, on the off chance that someone might barge in or look over their shoulder without them noticing?

EDIT--Thanks for pointing that out, liveordie83. That's in large part what I was trying to get at. I'm pretty sure this forum has such a rule too (for example, DG for dickgirl, SW for swap, etc).