Well hell, glinaur, I believe I owe you an apology.
I, myself, am from an era where rules were posted out in the open; when newbies got a delicate primer before seeing the cluebat of PrBlahBlahtson.
I suppose I'm just crusty from years of spammers ignoring the name of the forums, that I don't recognize a genuine mistake when it's made.
For that, I am truly sorry; that said, Katt is right to express indignation.
@Phoenix: Try having a half-dozen friends who saw their Cast Member benefits slashed in the wake of ACA, and see if you can resist taking a poke at The Rat.
@madcow: This isn't surprising, as every discussion I've had with you is like pulling teeth. I'd like to say that I'm not ALWAYS an asshole, but every time I am, you have this inexplicable urge to be the one to call me out. Y u backseat modding, bro?
@qzar9999: The rules need better structure so that people know crimes and their requisite punishments. I'd be more inclined to avoid "points" if I knew what they meant; as it stands right now, there is no definition nor concrete stick to accompany the carrot, just a vague notion of "don't get too many." As they're not defined, I'm left to wonder: what, exactly,
is a point? If I get enough, do I win a free trip to Boca? I'm just saying, some basic ground rules would make all of this much smoother.
@vaxon: I'm of two minds regarding this thread. While it's plainly not concerned with the requisite category nor the
process thereof, it wouldn't be fair to a new user's misunderstanding or the public record to just raze it and start over. I erred in my initial response; but just letting the Council pick-and-choose what content is censored would indicate that we've learned nothing in the past decade.
@glinaur: I never answered your original question because it was badly miscategorized.
That said, her name is Nene Anegasaki (jp: 姉ヶ崎 寧々); she is from LovePlus and is naturally that endowed.