Quote:
Originally Posted by littlegreenboggart
I do not understand this connexion you do with sex or erotic things and a female transformations...
I do not want an erotic, fetish or other things I have not fetishes and I just want to see more female transformations, End.
The nude in American cinema is not a problem, the hypocrisy in the cinema instead is a problem...
90% of Hollywood actresses have shot at least one or two movies with nudity, but not for what it is, necessarily, sex or porn. The sexy and porn it does not concern me or my interests, I want only the equivalent, uncensored, of the male transformations in female versions.
|
You seem to be very, very confused.
Firstly, this site that you are on, is dedicated to erotic female transformations, transformations on a fetish level in general. If you managed to wander in here without understanding that, I'm clearing it up for you now.
Also, please don't pull some imaginary nudity statistic out of your ass like that and try to pretend it's in any way factual.
Lastly.... they tried a female werewolf transformation with nudity in the sequel to AWIL... it was called 'American Werewolf in Paris', and that movie was terrible. You think the guy planning the remake of AWIL doesn't know that AWIP was awful? A female werewolf is the least likely thing he's ever going to put into the remake if he wants the thing to actually be taken seriously and make money.
Here's my prediction;
Mostly faithful remake of the original
No female werewolf
No Nazi dream sequence
CG transformation
not in full hard lighting but heavily shadowed to hide the poor CG
The only practical effects will be undead Jack up until the point he's replaced with a CG skeleton.
No nudity
PG13 rating
That is what a modern remake of an 80s classic looks like, so that's what we'll get. Don't like it? Then skip it and only watch the original because it's always going to be the superior version.