Kidzilla

[hewylewis]

Anybody read this book? Because I sure haven't. Although, the cover does intrigue me. Here's the description.

"Don't bother looking for PsychoZone on a Map. It's not a place...but a state of mind where the worlds of reality and imagination collide. A place where a kid can wake up and have morphed into a giant lizard. Or where one can place a long distance phone call...to the future. Or where the monsters of your worst nightmares come alive, and where car trips that are sooo boring you think they'll last forever...

In the PsychoZone."

[Anahki]

I'm sorry to say that but...
a)If the main character is male, then ->wrong forum
b)If the main character is female, but in fact she is a kid then -> no pedos' here, thank you.

[CNash]

Excuse me? Since when does the TF subject being a kid exclude them from this forum? If you'll look on the main page, you'll find a forum catering to Age Progression, which has always included children as TF subjects. The artist Chica posts here, and his speciality is TFing kids.

But why do I need to explain this to you? Surely you know that not all transformations are sexual in nature? And a TF in a young adult novel such as this would certainly not be sexual. So your last comment is not only misinformed and insulting, but also nonsensical.

[Chica]

Thank you! Nice to see people with sense post here.

Originally Posted by CNash

Excuse me? Since when does the TF subject being a kid exclude them from this forum? If you'll look on the main page, you'll find a forum catering to Age Progression, which has always included children as TF subjects. The artist Chica posts here, and his speciality is TFing kids.

But why do I need to explain this to you? Surely you know that not all transformations are sexual in nature? And a TF in a young adult novel such as this would certainly not be sexual. So your last comment is not only misinformed and insulting, but also nonsensical.

[TF-Viewer]

Looks like it's most certainly male TF. In that case it goes under "everything else" not general TF.

[Drachen]

Originally Posted by CNash

Excuse me? Since when does the TF subject being a kid exclude them from this forum? If you'll look on the main page, you'll find a forum catering to Age Progression, which has always included children as TF subjects. The artist Chica posts here, and his speciality is TFing kids.

But why do I need to explain this to you? Surely you know that not all transformations are sexual in nature? And a TF in a young adult novel such as this would certainly not be sexual. So your last comment is not only misinformed and insulting, but also nonsensical.

The thing is, not all transformations are welcome at The Process. There are pretty strict but simple rules about gender and process requirements. Lorekeep calls the different forums "fetishes" in the official welcome post. That and the "only female" restriction imply a lot of sexual context to something that might not be sexual at first blush. It might not be as clearly inappropriate as a pre-teen BE would be, but it still makes quite a few of us uncomfortable in a place that bills itself as a fetish forum and has tons of blatantly sexual material posted on it.

[Anahki]

Originally Posted by Drachen

The thing is, not all transformations are welcome at The Process. There are pretty strict but simple rules about gender and process requirements. Lorekeep calls the different forums "fetishes" in the official welcome post. That and the "only female" restriction imply a lot of sexual context to something that might not be sexual at first blush. It might not be as clearly inappropriate as a pre-teen BE would be, but it still makes quite a few of us uncomfortable in a place that bills itself as a fetish forum and has tons of blatantly sexual material posted on it.

Thank you Drachen, so I don't need to waste my time trying, once more, to keep the forum safe from the pedobear fans.

@CNash: if you are so sure that you're right, try to explain the same to a non-regular poster here. I could accept some "weird" and "strange" things, because I consider myself open-minded, but there are limits for everything. And the underage issue is one limit that almost everyone here has. So if you are insulting me, so you are doing the same with most people around here.

[utopianfubar]

Only ting i ahve to say, and i don't normaly post. You can't just imply somebody is a peado. Even if they posted stuff in the wrong place etc.
it's slander and just ignorant on your part.

[Drachen]

Originally Posted by utopianfubar

Only ting i ahve to say, and i don't normaly post. You can't just imply somebody is a peado. Even if they posted stuff in the wrong place etc.
it's slander and just ignorant on your part.

First, it would be libel. It's published in print. Second, there's another issue here that goes beyond just opinion or forum rules; there are legal worries. In many jurisdictions mere possession of anything resembling child pornography is a serious crime, even if the images are computer-generated and did not involve a minor.

Like I said, try to imagine the reaction in the BE forum if pre-teen BE material was posted. This would be similar but the subject of this forum isn't as blatantly sexual, but it is sexual nonetheless. Lorekeep explicitly calls it a "fetish" forum. If you don't understand that, the ignorant party here is not us.

[TF-Viewer]

Originally Posted by Drachen

First, it would be libel. It's published in print. Second, there's another issue here that goes beyond just opinion or forum rules; there are legal worries. In many jurisdictions mere possession of anything resembling child pornography is a serious crime, even if the images are computer-generated and did not involve a minor.

Like I said, try to imagine the reaction in the BE forum if pre-teen BE material was posted. This would be similar but the subject of this forum isn't as blatantly sexual, but it is sexual nonetheless. Lorekeep explicitly calls it a "fetish" forum. If you don't understand that, the ignorant party here is not us.

I know you're trying really hard to make your case but it's entirely moot in this situation. That book is not pornographic. Even if it has a child transform in it, transformation is not universally sexual in nature, most of it is completely benign and harmless, such as this case. It doesn't matter what the age of the character is in transformation media when it's not depicted in a sexual way.

The reason it actually doesn't belong in this section is it's male TF, first and foremost.

And please, try to understand that not everyone here faps to each and every type of transformation that's posted. Some people actually do have a non-sexual interest in this stuff, hard to believe when this site is advertised as transformation fetish in nature, but not everything on it is porn. And that book, is certainly not child pornography so let's just let the issue die.

[Snowglare]

I only visit the Process for sexual fetish material, but I agree with TF-Viewer. It's not inherently sexual. Most people can look at mainstream TF material, which is clearly what this is, and never imagine anyone finds it titillating. It's OK to have kids transform in a non-sexual way, and it's easy to tell the difference between sexual and non-sexual.

In other words, Pinocchio ain't kiddie porn, no matter how many of us it turned into deviants.

[TF-Viewer]

Originally Posted by Snowglare

I only visit the Process for sexual fetish material, but I agree with TF-Viewer. It's not inherently sexual. Most people can look at mainstream TF material, which is clearly what this is, and never imagine anyone finds it titillating. It's OK to have kids transform in a non-sexual way, and it's easy to tell the difference between sexual and non-sexual.

In other words, Pinocchio ain't kiddie porn, no matter how many of us it turned into deviants.

I agree with you for agreeing with me.