free hit counters
Bombing in Boston - Page 4 - The Process Forum
The Process Forum  

Go Back   The Process Forum > The Process General > General Discussion

Inflation and Process ClipsProcess Productions Store Inflation and Process Clips

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-20-2013   #37
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Bombing in Boston

First off, "Public Safety" exception to Miranda. It's been around just as long, and certainly applies to people WILLING TO BLOW THE SHIT OUT OF FELLOW CITIZENS.

Second, Tsarnaev isn't alive for a lack of trying to die; he just ran out of ammo.

Third, I can't be the only one to think this is Chechnya coming back to bite us square on the ass.
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #38
darththeo
A TG+BE loving Sith Lord
 
darththeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 466
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincent_richter View Post
First off, "Public Safety" exception to Miranda. It's been around just as long, and certainly applies to people WILLING TO BLOW THE SHIT OUT OF FELLOW CITIZENS.

Second, Tsarnaev isn't alive for a lack of trying to die; he just ran out of ammo.

Third, I can't be the only one to think this is Chechnya coming back to bite us square on the ass.
There is a public safety exception, but the police are required to capture someone alive if possible, not kill them. They aren't judge, jury or an executioner ... their job is to make arrests and stop known/suspected criminals (which lethal force is a last resort).
__________________
My Avatar is Satale Shan of EA/Bioware Star Wars: The Old Republic and was drawn by BEGirl69

darththeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #39
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by darththeo View Post
There is a public safety exception, but the police are required to capture someone alive if possible, not kill them. They aren't judge, jury or an executioner ... their job is to make arrests and stop known/suspected criminals (which lethal force is a last resort).
Fair enough, but credit where it's due: Boston PD didn't haul off and execute a known cop-killer, which is impressive in its own right as it's better than he would've got anywhere else. Once you decide that a cop's life is worthless enough to summarily execute one, it's a reasonable expectation that others will find your life equally forfeit. That Tsarnaev wasn't gunned down in that damned boat is a testament to the restraint and patience of the officers involved - not to any feat or advantage owed him.
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #40
OhZone
OhYeah!
 
OhZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 38,933
Re: Bombing in Boston

I'm glad they got the guy, but I wish this more about Bimbo-ing in Boston instead! Oh well.
__________________
-
OhZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #41
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Bombing in Boston

As long as he's having a blast, teehee!
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #42
Drachen
Pinocchio Pornographer
 
Drachen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the shadow of the Empire State Building
Posts: 2,137
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincent_richter View Post
First off, "Public Safety" exception to Miranda. It's been around just as long, and certainly applies to people WILLING TO BLOW THE SHIT OUT OF FELLOW CITIZENS.
That's not the point of that exception. Complete pieces of shit have rights too. That was the whole point of the Miranda warning in the first place. The reason that's read to everyone on arrest was because a kidnapper and rapist got away on a technicality just because his rights were violated. There's a good argument for the public safety exception because these guys were bombers and it's quite possible that there are other devices out there. It's not because he injured and killed a lot of people.

It's also worth reminding people that whatever else he is, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is an American citizen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincent_richter View Post
Third, I can't be the only one to think this is Chechnya coming back to bite us square on the ass.
You probably are. Besides making complaints that the Russians were too harsh on their own people and allowing some Chechen political refugees into the country, we didn't get involved in Chechnya at all. You might be thinking of the 2008 incident between Georgia and Russia that John McCain tried briefly to make a campaign issue. If I were to have made a list of probable organizations and ethnicities likely to have perpetrated the bombing, Chechens would have been down near the bottom along with the Tamil Tigers and the Real IRA.
__________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Drachen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #43
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincent_richter View Post
Second, Tsarnaev isn't alive for a lack of trying to die; he just ran out of ammo.
He didn't offer himself up to die as his brother did. He wasn't the one with explosives strapped to his body. I don't doubt he would have proceeded to kill more people with additional ammunition.

Quote:
Third, I can't be the only one to think this is Chechnya coming back to bite us square on the ass.
Pretty sure it's just a couple Chechen jihadists. As per Drachen, not a lot of American involvement in that struggle.

I'm not sure these men had any separatist organisation behind them. We'll see whether Tamerlan recieved training over the last couple years.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #44
OhZone
OhYeah!
 
OhZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 38,933
Re: Bombing in Boston

Rachel on the Miranda Rights issue.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/2...iranda-rights/
__________________
-
OhZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #45
tghawk555
New look! Whatcha think?
 
tghawk555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bimboland, USA
Posts: 5,822
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by OhZone View Post
I'm glad they got the guy, but I wish this more about Bimbo-ing in Boston instead! Oh well.
Would that it were, my dear Ozara, would that it were...
__________________
A bimbo, like, isn't a bimbo unless they, like, talk in pink font! *giggle*

Teehee! Like what you see, boys?

There need to be more werewoman TG sequences!!

A TG sequence is not a TG sequence without process and a clothes change!

Bimbos Aren't Sluts! 181 supporters and counting!

Official bet between me and OhZone (Result to be determined on November 4, 2020)

Check out my dA: TGHawk's Lounge
tghawk555 is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2013   #46
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drachen
It's also worth reminding people that whatever else he is, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is an American citizen.
Drastic oversimplification on my part, but when there's the possibility of more devices out there endangering more innocent lives, discovering that information has to be worth more than your right to invoke. That's not saying he should be waterboarded, merely that he needs to be held until it can be determined that he's not gonna phone a friend and blow up half of Times Square.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drachen
If I were to have made a list of probable organizations and ethnicities likely to have perpetrated the bombing, Chechens would have been down near the bottom along with the Tamil Tigers and the Real IRA.
I suppose it says something about the times that I first suspected white supremacists - if not a definite pattern. Think about it, though: what louder way to say "you're not paying attention" than by blowing up a few thousand civilians on one of the world's largest stages?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel_Bronwyn
He didn't offer himself up to die as his brother did. He wasn't the one with explosives strapped to his body. I don't doubt he would have proceeded to kill more people with additional ammunition.
I'm glad you left that last line intact.
Is he a stone-cold killer? He ran over his brother when fleeing campus.
Does he fully appreciate the gravity of his actions? That's significantly harder to gauge.
What concerns me is the possibility that he knew exactly what he was doing, and that people are willing to write off the wanton devastation he caused, simply because he got squeamish.
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-21-2013   #47
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Bombing in Boston

What's the belief suspects are less likely to talk after being read their rights based on? Wouldn't suspects know, prior to those rights being read, that remaining silent may be beneficial? Wouldn't they be familiar with the Miranda warning prior to being apprehended? I'm confused.

I don't know whether the man understands what he's done. I don't have sufficient information to formulate an opinion on that. I wouldn't claim running over his brother's body is evidence he's a stone-cold killer. If I saw my sister killed and knew I was next, I'd flee without concern for her body too.

He seems to be less gung-ho about dying for the cause than his bro. I'm not handwaving away his actions. If anything, I think his brother's willingness to die showed more integrity (albeit dreadfully misguided, in my opinion) than his hiding in a boat.

Last edited by Rachel Bronwyn; 04-21-2013 at 01:53 AM.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-21-2013   #48
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Bombing in Boston

I amend previous statements. Looks like he tried to blow himself and those trying to recover him up a couple times while hiding the the boat. See video here. It seems he's not great with explosives.

EDIT: Those were flash-bang devices to impair the suspect, not anything he set off.

Last edited by Rachel Bronwyn; 04-22-2013 at 11:51 PM. Reason: My mistake
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.