free hit counters
Rick Baker retires. This is bad. - Page 3 - The Process Forum
The Process Forum  

Go Back   The Process Forum > Content Forums > Transformation

Inflation and Process ClipsProcess Productions Store Inflation and Process Clips

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-13-2016   #25
Xanderfox
Process Master
 
Xanderfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 589
Re: Rick Baker retires. This is bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sybersamurai View Post
Rick Baker already retired practically. When was the last movie that fully utilized him? The Wolfman is a perfect example. You have the legend himself doing the movie he always wanted to do and they ended up using him more as just a consultant in favor of that garbage CGI scene.
It's more the who "it's official now" thing, he was effectively retired before he officially retired.

Hollywood has always had problems and always will. Finding the right way to use special effects technology is just one of a laundry list of issues that will always persist. A New technology will often be used unnecessarily, making certain moves worse experiences by focusing on a gimmick rather than an entertaining story and characters. When a film is CGI driven failure is easy to see, when film makers misuse it or rely on it too wow the audience to try and make what is a sub par effort successful. There will also always be film makers who use technology right, who can use a spectacular CG effect to make a film better.
Xanderfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016   #26
popperock
Frequent Poster
 
popperock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 188
Re: Rick Baker retires. This is bad.

Luckily, Rob Bottin's still around too. If you've never heard of him, he did the effects for The Thing, RoboCop and The Howlling and was Baker's understudy.

As an aside, I too find the CGI sploogefest in movies tiring as well. I don't get how people think that they look better than practical. Look at Escape from New York vs. Escape from L.A. for example. New York is all practical (even the computer readout on the glider is a practical effect, done by some Canadian dude named Jim Cameron) and uses matte paintings to simulate the New York skyline (also done by Cameron). It still looks realistic today. L.A., on the other hand, has some of the shoddiest fucking CGI work I've ever seen in a film, especially the surfing scene. I mean fuck, the surfing scenes you used to see on 60's TV, the one's that were clearly just the actors standing in front of a rear projector and pretending to balance looked better than Escape from L.A., and that was done on four times the budget of the first film (and yes, that is adjusting for inflation). I guess my point is fuck lazy ass directors that want to do everything difficult in post and the shit studios who force CGI in films due to lobbying by the industry.
__________________
Oh yeah, the guy in the $3000 suit is going to hold the elevator for a guy who doesn't make that in three months. COME ON!
popperock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.