Dear Jae,

Rachel Bronwyn · 10-23-2013

It has become apparent you understood a post of mine to mean something I absolutely did not intend to communicate. As a result, it was hurtful to you, for which I'm genuinely sorry.

When I made this post it was not my intention to imply the infant whose image you were using as an avatar was ugly. I didn't intend to imply anything about the infant except that their association with you who, by all accounts, have treated me abhorrently, makes them undesirable to me. In fact, days ago I provided the same clarification in this post, but I assume you did not see it prior to your suspension.

Anyways, I failed to effectively communicate. As a result, you thought I was taking a shot at the child themself, which I completely understand would be an out of line and hurtful insult to hurl. I am sorry for failing to communicate effectively and, as a result, hurting you.

Take care,
Rachel

10-23-2013	#1
Rachel Bronwyn Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 4,002	Dear Jae, It has become apparent you understood a post of mine to mean something I absolutely did not intend to communicate. As a result, it was hurtful to you, for which I'm genuinely sorry. When I made this post it was not my intention to imply the infant whose image you were using as an avatar was ugly. I didn't intend to imply anything about the infant except that their association with you who, by all accounts, have treated me abhorrently, makes them undesirable to me. In fact, days ago I provided the same clarification in this post, but I assume you did not see it prior to your suspension. Anyways, I failed to effectively communicate. As a result, you thought I was taking a shot at the child themself, which I completely understand would be an out of line and hurtful insult to hurl. I am sorry for failing to communicate effectively and, as a result, hurting you. Take care, Rachel