free hit counters
Stupid Creationist! - Page 11 - The Process Forum
The Process Forum  

Go Back   The Process Forum > The Process General > General Discussion

Inflation and Process ClipsProcess Productions Store Inflation and Process Clips

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2009   #1
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Stupid Creationist!

Sorry, dude; she's Romanian.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009   #2
LOD
Tieing a Knot Or two
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Breaking Down The Walls Of Your Imagination.
Posts: 19,674
Re: Stupid Creationist!

Romainian girls are jst as exotic...
__________________



Claire's Project
LOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009   #3
qzar9999
Purveyor of Porn
 
qzar9999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gallifrey
Posts: 7,071
Re: Stupid Creationist!

genderhazard--

You're much better at this than I was. Huzzah! I salute you.
__________________
Tace atque abi. Plenus stercoris est.

Editor/Writer, Shrink Fan and Transform Fan

Check out Interweb Comics on Twitter or Instagram for all kinds of fun, sexy stuff covering multiple fetishes!

Cezar's Comix - New 11/15! http://www.e-junkie.com/cezarscomix

My eBooks at amzn.to/1CDS22w or bit.ly/1BZqaCp

Quidquid Latine dictum altum videtur.

My DeviantArt.

Full list of my stories here.

How I feel when certain users post anything.
qzar9999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009   #4
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Stupid Creationist!

Quote:
Originally Posted by genderhazard View Post
Rachael I'm disappointed in you.
I.... don?t care?

Quote:
I have already provided basic information on who mitochondrial Eve is. You want me to expand upon Eve, yet you send me to just fucking google it.com telling me to Do my own homework.
When you ask a favour of me such as an answer to a question it?s your responsibility to provide me with satisfactory explanation, not mine. I?m the one doing the favour. You?re the one benefitting. Hence, you need to step up, not I. I?m not going out of my way to answer a question for someone who can?t be arsed to explain themselves.

By suggesting you google an answer to a stupid question you posed earlier, I provided you with a means by which to find the answer as opposed to wasting my time. Use the suggestion.

Quote:
And I asked you to show me this extensive evidence. If it is extensive then this should not be hard for you. (and it will take more than the size and shape of beaks.)
The mere fact you?re behaving in this manner suggests you don?t believe I?m capable of providing this information and will refute what I do provide (which is readily available and extensive, by the way.) I?ve dealt with many idiots in my life. Why spend time on another?

The evidence is readily available to you as is the scientific method; something you?ve yet to incorporate. If you give a shit, by these means you will find that answer. There is only one right answer in this case.

Quote:
This is not fact this is conjecture.
So you either don?t know the meaning of conjecture or what the scientific method is. Not my job to open your brain or teach you grammar.

Some of the quotes you?ve found are hilariously creationist in nature and from the mouths, fingers and minds of individuals who don?t understand evolution or the scientific method. If I?m going to engage in a discussion with anyone about a matter this massive, they best have the same knowledge and understanding I have. You don?t. You?ve demonstrated as much as well as a keen interest in concluding that humans have not having been different ?in the beginning?, which is a ludicrous conclusion to come to by all accounts ? more evidence of your ignorance. What, pray tell, evidence do we have of a bipedal hominid existing pre-Ardi? None. BUT THERE COULD HAVE BEEN! There also could have been unicorns prior to horses. It?s still a fucking ludicrous thing to say sans evidence.

If you were being remotely reasonable or basing your opinions on something other than religion and hilariously unscientific commentary, I might be willing to discuss this with you for the sake of education. I?m not putting effort into what is ultimately a waste of time for me though. I can verify my correctness as can the universal scientific community. That?s good enough for me. Your approval doesn?t come into play. The scientific method is a bit higher up on that totem pole.

I am tired of addressing the readily dismissed only to have my concrete proof denied by those with agendas. While I am prone to these behaviours, they exhaust me. I entirely promote Dawkins? idea all discussion with creationists about evolution be halted. The energy I waste on these people could be used in a far more productive manner, hence why anyone displaying creationist behaviours makes the ignore list. I will not waste energy on what is a fool?s mission. I will keep those creationists who come up with fresh ways by which to "disprove" scientific theory for as long as they can throw new ideas at me and don't deny the scientific evidence that contradicts there "What if"'s. Responding to the same false evidences over and over again though is boring and frustrating. When scientifically legitimate criticisms become apparent I will thoroughly examine them. Until then, I have to make the world a better place by encouraging scientific output.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009   #5
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Stupid Creationist!

"Every single piece of fossil ever found is a transitional form - from something to something else - you ignorrant moron" was my favourite line.

I love Kirk's "crocoduck" argument, suggesting in order for something to be transitional it has to be half the species it's evoling from and half the new species, ie: a duck body with a crocodile head.

Honestly, could he display his ignorrance towards evolution more blatantly?
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009   #6
sodacat
Calling from the New Era
 
sodacat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,005
Re: Stupid Creationist!

The best part about the crocoduck challenge was that we have found crocoducks.
__________________
Quote:
the axe forgets | the tree remembers
The Monster Girls Wiki. Never trust a pretty face.
Deviantart | Furaffinity. I write things here.
sodacat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009   #7
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Stupid Creationist!

I'm sure it's not crocoducky enough for Kirk, Ray and his banana.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009   #8
genderhazard
Spell I bought is work'n
 
genderhazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,095
Re: Stupid Creationist!

Quote:
Originally Posted by OhZone View Post
I thought the bananaman cleared this all up already!
genderhazard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009   #9
TF-Viewer
Slave to the Process Forum
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,782
Re: Stupid Creationist!

Quote:
Originally Posted by genderhazard View Post
... when he found out that humans had altered the banana.. he just automatically jumps to "god gave man the knowledge and ability to alter the banana" it's such a facepalm moment. That's just being stubborn.
TF-Viewer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009   #10
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Stupid Creationist!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TF-Viewer View Post
... when he found out that humans had altered the banana.. he just automatically jumps to "god gave man the knowledge and ability to alter the banana" it's such a facepalm moment. That's just being stubborn.
The comment destroys his initial argument. One moment he's suggesting "design" is evident in organisms like bananas and human hands. The next, he's saying gawd provides man with information in order to alter his creation. How the hell does that counter evolution or suggest design? It doesn't. At all.

Even if the claim jeebus talks to people were scientifically verifiable, Ray and his banana would be completely without evidence of intelligent design. I'm not about to argue the existence of gawd with him because it's a matter of faith and is, by definition, unverifiable. The claims Kirk and the bananaman put forward that I will counter are their "scientific" arguments for intelligent design, none of which have held any water thus far as one can see in the banana incident. Gawd giving people information isn't evidence of anything though.

Seriously, what a fucking retard.

Last edited by Rachel Bronwyn; 10-07-2009 at 03:38 PM.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009   #11
LookAtIt
Sexy Zombie (It Burns!)
 
LookAtIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In your imagination.
Posts: 1,214
Re: Stupid Creationist!

Jesus is my favorite zombie!
__________________
Some of my artwork on a microdot:

New Deviant Art Site: http://~look-at-it-now.deviantart.com/
LookAtIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009   #12
Lord T Hawkeye
It's play time!
 
Lord T Hawkeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,183
Re: Stupid Creationist!



Vid on Mitochondrial eve to any who is interested.
__________________
My stories
Cat girl sorceresses, tentacled doctors, maid robots and a doll super hero. What more could you ask for?

Hey Dollyteers! Dolly's got herself a comic now! Go check it out!
Lord T Hawkeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.