![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 59
|
Re: Female Werewolf needles in a haystack
I can and will agree, that practical effects would be the only why to go for the remake. Using CGI only as a way to enhance the practical effects. (Hiding zippers esc.) But I can also see studio interference on the movie as a whole.
Let's go cheap..... So...... CGI to the rescue!!!!!! At one time CGI was expensive, but nowadays it's cheaper than practical effects. .... I'm sad now. ![]() I do hope Landis is able to make this movie a reality. As for other reasons to remake a classic...... $$$$$$Money,Money,Money$$$$$$$$ Honestly, I have heard worse reasons for remakes. One day, they will remake Jaws. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Woof?
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,569
|
Re: Female Werewolf needles in a haystack
Quote:
__________________
Hey everyone! I started a Patreon page, if you like my art and want to help support me please consider donating! My Patreon Also check out my Discord Server where we have good fun discussion and also I post pics sometimes. :3 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
AAWIL fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Talbot Manor
Posts: 1,797
|
Re: Female Werewolf needles in a haystack
Quote:
1) This is something so obscure that it will never see the daylight or if done so, maybe with a different name. No need to say that it is not in IMDB. 2) The movie has become a "festival voyager" with no luck (typical destiny for such films), so it would not be available online ever. 3) Apply previous comment, with the addition that it seems that it didn´t even pass the filter of any festival, and of course the authors seem not having any intention of show their work for free. 4) Actually on production. The lesson for all "you, future short-film makers": Don't be assholes, if the mainstream consider that your work is crap, you get nothing hidden them from the public and thus pretending that they never existed... unless you are filming some kind of porn/snuff/whatever. Maybe you feel that you failed with your artwork, but perhaps you didn't aimed it to the correct target :P. And don't that art too serious, men. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 238
|
Re: Female Werewolf needles in a haystack
Quote:
1) “Bitch” looks to be 100% CGI, so I’m not too keen on this one. 2) I actually saw “Blue Moon” a year or so ago (I forgot how; I think I just contacted the director), and I can assure you that there is ZERO process and basically no TF, which is quite a shame since the actress is gorgeous. (This is what I meant before about how there were so many female werewolf shorts in the past that came so close only to not show anything at the last second.) She basically just flashes yellow eyes and fangs (I think), and then in the next shot, she’s the full werewolf. Hard pass. 3) I’ve been following “Kiss of the Wolf” for a while now, but who knows if it’s ever going to be released. Honestly, it doesn’t look all that good, to tell you the truth, so I’m not that upset about this one. 4) This is the first time I’m hearing about “Betsy,” and it looks amazing, so thank you for sharing this link. I already contributed to its campaign, and I hope others here do, too. Just the poster alone is the greatest/sexiest female werewolf movie poster I have ever seen in my life (yes, that includes “Ginger Snaps”). Obviously, this is a low-budget movie, so it won’t be the so-called “holy grail” of a female “AWIL,” but beggars can’t be choosers, and the actress starring as the titular female werewolf is gorgeous, they are using practical effects, and, if the director/writer’s past work is any indication, there will be lots of nudity. They already have enough funds to make the movie; they’re just looking for a little extra for “better special effects,” among other things. Let’s fund this one, boys! (and girls) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|