03-10-2010 | #613 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 63
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
|
03-10-2010 | #614 |
Mostly gone
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
You're not funny, johnsmith.
|
03-10-2010 | #615 |
The Defiant Soul
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Riverson City, Rhydin County
Posts: 826
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
Just ignore Johnsmith, we can easily wait for Cluedog/Smooch to post it on his DA Account which will happen eventually
|
03-10-2010 | #616 |
Process Ambassador
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Paris
Posts: 963
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
We'll just wait for that SdazVrance. Not worth the attention though.
__________________
My commissions : http://unevenguy.deviantart.com/ |
03-10-2010 | #617 |
Modest Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,998
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
Hilarious.
I personally have no problem with you wanting to charge for it, that's fine (as long as its cleared with Smooch) but doing this just strikes me as...well, kinda rude.
__________________
Meh. Cranky and old. |
03-10-2010 | #618 |
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,258
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
John, you either make a commission with the intent to sell (and actually make it look like a product, complete with a store to sell it on), or post it for free. If you paid money for something, don't expect others to pay you for it because you feel like you should be compensated for your decision to spend money.
I almost banned you for your ATTITUDE about it, but I'm giving you a very strong warning. You can commission with intent to sell, but there's a way to do it. The way you did it is insulting and disruptive.
__________________
|
03-10-2010 | #619 |
Leecher
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
that was nice of you jhon smith... perhaps... too nice
|
03-10-2010 | #620 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 82
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
I dunno, about too nice maybe a bit grasping at wanting his money back for a few pages of porn, that must be a huge bummer to realize that the guy he bought it from will make it available for free on his DA page. In my opinion if you want to be payed for something you dont put it on the internet, because sooner or later someone is going to nick it post it on a forum, blog, or porn site so you get less money.
|
03-10-2010 | #621 |
Do I Dare to Eat a Peach?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 55
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
Hhaha, did someone seriously just lord a set of commissions over us?
"Look at the money I spent on this shiny picture, BUT DON'T LOOK AT IT I SPENT MY MONEY I'M JUST TELLING YOU so you know I spent my money." |
03-10-2010 | #622 |
Perverted Skeleton
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,041
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
Seriously, what's the point of having a picture commissioned if you're the only one who's going to see it? I've always put the pictures I've commissioned up in public view right off because it just seems like a waste not to. Well, unless somehow you're the only who can appreciate the picture, but that seems unlikely considering this is the internet.
|
03-10-2010 | #623 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 98
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
|
03-10-2010 | #624 |
Process Master
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 855
|
Re: More general 'increased beauty'
Can we get back on topic?
Or am I going to have to break out the flame thrower?
__________________
. |
|
|