free hit counters
Bombing in Boston - Page 6 - The Process Forum
The Process Forum  

Go Back   The Process Forum > The Process General > General Discussion

Inflation and Process ClipsProcess Productions Store Inflation and Process Clips

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-21-2013   #1
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Bombing in Boston

I don't think the people being personally harassed by them feel it's unwarranted. Mockery is the only way to deal with them as long as limitations on their funeral protests are so weak.

And FARC is a revolutionary, not terrorist, organisation. And Irish terrorism isn't real terrorism at all. When are people going to get it through their heads that terrorism is only terrorism if the perpetrators are Islamic?
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2013   #2
cpt soban
Likely Suspect
 
cpt soban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 476
Re: Bombing in Boston

With flagrant waving of rights, media being used to frequently emotionalize issues and report on half facts, and the constitution being ignored on a weekly basis, this country is going to a scary place.

By I scary place I of course mean 1938 eastern Europe. All we need is a Hitler, Palin ought to do nicely.
cpt soban is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2013   #3
Sephie
EYES UP HERE
 
Sephie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow
Posts: 9,693
Re: Bombing in Boston

Wait, you claim that right wing nutjobs haven't killed anybody? Seriously?
__________________
You can also call me by my title, "Her Omniscient Bitchyness" or H.O.B. For short
Source for avatar: http://clayrseer.deviantart.com/art/...12209#/d3a5yq0
Sephie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2013   #4
Red_Mage
Process Disciple
 
Red_Mage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,980
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
The FBI dropped the ball, in part because it was spending all its time training to watch the tea party and christian groups
Familiar though I'm sure you are with the FBI's internal goings on and procedures, I'm going to go ahead and doubt that.

Quote:
a large percentage due support its actions either financially, or as part of the general abuse of minorities in muslim dominated areas.
A large percentage? Do you have anything to back up that ridiculous opinion, or are you just pulling vague ideas out of your ass?

Quote:
Wait, you claim that right wing nutjobs haven't killed anybody? Seriously?
Let's not even go there.
__________________
http://mightaswellbeme.deviantart.com/ <- Here there be writings. By me. Because I do that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daichi Azure View Post
C) Only you can prevent forum fires!
Red_Mage is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2013   #5
Sephie
EYES UP HERE
 
Sephie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow
Posts: 9,693
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Mage View Post
Let's not even go there.
?
__________________
You can also call me by my title, "Her Omniscient Bitchyness" or H.O.B. For short
Source for avatar: http://clayrseer.deviantart.com/art/...12209#/d3a5yq0
Sephie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2013   #6
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Bombing in Boston

He already went there. Sephie just followed through.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2013   #7
Red_Mage
Process Disciple
 
Red_Mage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,980
Re: Bombing in Boston

I just dislike the whole "right wingers v. left wingers: who's killed more" argument. It feels too much like pointing fingers at one "side" or the other, as though the psychos have anything to do with their mainstream counterparts. It's all done for political one-upsmanship, and it's a waste of time. Terrorism is terrorism.

And he's right, anyway. Or at least half right. He specifically said that the "Tea Party" never killed anyone. He was wrong in propagating this silly notion that the government can't fight terrorism and watch right wing extremist at the same time (and in the asserting that the Tea Party is who they were watching to begin with), but he was right that the Tea Party movement itself hasn't killed anyone. You said right wing extremists, not him.

Christian groups, on the other hand...that's a horse of a different color. But in any case, I don't see any value in finger pointing.
__________________
http://mightaswellbeme.deviantart.com/ <- Here there be writings. By me. Because I do that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daichi Azure View Post
C) Only you can prevent forum fires!
Red_Mage is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-23-2013   #8
Sephie
EYES UP HERE
 
Sephie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow
Posts: 9,693
Re: Bombing in Boston

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Mage View Post
I just dislike the whole "right wingers v. left wingers: who's killed more" argument. It feels too much like pointing fingers at one "side" or the other, as though the psychos have anything to do with their mainstream counterparts. It's all done for political one-upsmanship, and it's a waste of time. Terrorism is terrorism.
I was not making such an argument. I was making a argument that the claim "Has not killed anyone" was inaccurate
Quote:
And he's right, anyway. Or at least half right. He specifically said that the "Tea Party" never killed anyone. He was wrong in propagating this silly notion that the government can't fight terrorism and watch right wing extremist at the same time (and in the asserting that the Tea Party is who they were watching to begin with), but he was right that the Tea Party movement itself hasn't killed anyone. You said right wing extremists, not him.

Christian groups, on the other hand...that's a horse of a different color. But in any case, I don't see any value in finger pointing.
I assumed he was refering to the types of groups that the government was watching when he said Tea party as he had said
Quote:
The FBI dropped the ball, in part because it was spending all its time training to watch the tea party
followed by
Quote:
groups who haven't killed anybody
Either he is wrong on what he claimed the FBI was watching out of suspected terrorist tendencies or he misspoke and was wrong about their innocence.
__________________
You can also call me by my title, "Her Omniscient Bitchyness" or H.O.B. For short
Source for avatar: http://clayrseer.deviantart.com/art/...12209#/d3a5yq0
Sephie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2013   #9
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Bombing in Boston

The implication is right-wing groups aren't murderous while left-wing groups are.

"[D]idn't murder anyone" is a dreadful baseline for decency.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-23-2013   #10
Vengeance1701
Modest Moderator
 
Vengeance1701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,998
Re: Bombing in Boston

That and they have a whole ONE agent looking at right-wingers and 25 on Muslim extremists.
__________________
Meh. Cranky and old.
Vengeance1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2013   #11
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Bombing in Boston

What really bothers me is that Tsarnaev's mother is already calling them paintbombs, not real blood.

Really?

I mean, is there any way the Justice Department can write off a warrant on a couple hundred dollars worth of shoplifting, so this ostrich can tell Heather Abbott that she was just paintbombed and should stop toeing the party line?

I bet she wouldn't have the balls, as well she shouldn't.

She needs to come to grips with what her sons did.
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2013   #12
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Bombing in Boston

I doubt she believes what she's saying. She could be as shady as her kids. She's on the federal terror database too (or was according to some sources. Don't want to sound like I think I know what I'm talking about because I don't. Just an onlooker here.)

Last edited by Rachel Bronwyn; 04-26-2013 at 11:52 PM.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.