free hit counters
More general 'increased beauty' - Page 18 - The Process Forum
The Process Forum  

Go Back   The Process Forum > Content Forums > And Everything Else...

Inflation and Process ClipsProcess Productions Store Inflation and Process Clips

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-22-2008   #205
Derread
Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

I think this commercial belong here enjoy

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SWq7NRB2X9Q
Derread is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-25-2008   #206
DwarfPriest
Process Fan
 
DwarfPriest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brazil
Posts: 49
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

Hmm... Hadoukenchips http://hadoukenchips.deviantart.com/ did a little sequence called "sexification", where a girl goes through a slow and steady change, getting both a body change, and an attitude change. I talked to him, and decided to try my hand at it. There's some BE and WG included.
Here's a before and after: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...xyfication.jpg
__________________
Big is Better. My DeviantArt page
DwarfPriest is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-25-2008   #207
johnsmith
Process Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 98
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

Yuk...that's not increased beaut, this should be put in weight gain.
johnsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-25-2008   #208
foxmaster5
Fx Artist
 
foxmaster5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 361
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsmith View Post
Yuk...that's not increased beaut, this should be put in weight gain.
Choose your words carefully, this is a community forum and there are many different definitions of beauty. If Dwarfpriest says his work is beautified in his eyes then it is, and im sure there are others here that would agree with him.
__________________
Just Add Water DA: http://just-add-water99.deviantart.com/
BE and Giantess Comics and Pin ups updated bi-weekly!
foxmaster5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2008   #209
DwarfPriest
Process Fan
 
DwarfPriest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brazil
Posts: 49
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsmith View Post
Yuk...that's not increased beaut, this should be put in weight gain.
Is there really a reason for that "yuk"?
As I mentioned in my post, it has several things: "beautification", change of attitude, breast expansion, AND weight gain. If it were just that, I would have posted it in the other board.

Thanks, foxmaster5. Yeah, things can vary. I know lots of people that doesn't think that BE should be included in "lookint more beautiful" as well, for example. Matter of oppinion.
__________________
Big is Better. My DeviantArt page
DwarfPriest is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2008   #210
Chrisaka
Jusenkyou Cursed
 
Chrisaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 5
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

I don't think this thread is the right place for beating the old "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" argument into dust some more. For the simple sake of organization I think we should just keep this particular thread focused on the generally held concept of increased 'beauty' that was described in the beginning.
Chrisaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2008   #211
The Lord of War
Process Master? lol what?
 
The Lord of War's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC baby
Posts: 902
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

There isn't even any weight gain, it's weight loss actually....
The Lord of War is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2008   #212
johnsmith
Process Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 98
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lord of War View Post
There isn't even any weight gain, it's weight loss actually....

Oh so this isn't weight gain? For some reason it looked like it but I must be wrong.....


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...xyfication.jpg
johnsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2008   #213
catfish27
Frequent Poster
 
catfish27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 441
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsmith View Post
Corrected version of the link (not your fault, it's the way this board works when presented with a URL).
catfish27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2008   #214
Milo_Pepper
Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

Love this topic!

I remember another cartoon circa 1966 that had an Indian (Native American) princess that was hugely fat and I think it was dog kinda like the dog that was Droopy’s nemesis that had to get her married off. He tried all kinds of things to make her attractive; one was a corset that made her thin and beautiful until the lacings gave way.

Anyone else remember that one?
Milo_Pepper is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2008   #215
Shadowsbane99
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 284
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

I think that we might need to clarify what this thread is, since the concept of what is "beauty" is obviously subjective.

Now all I'm about to say after this is totally my opinion, and if you think the thread should or should not include something I am stating here, feel free to chime in with your opinion.

What is meant by Increased Beauty in this thread is:

1. Female only (I think male should be a different thread if it is asked for)
2. The common sociological view of the beautiful woman.

Now what is considered beautiful can actually widely range even in the "common" view, however I think the rough idea is not hard to understand.

What the transformation should NOT include is:

1. A predominantly non-human transformation. The transformation should begin mostly human and should definitely end near fully human. (Possible exceptions may apply, such as catgirls and succubi, as long as the transformation focuses on the beauty)

2. Breast expansion past E cup or EE, or breast expansion to exclusion. Those belong in the Breast Expansion forum area. If breasts get beyond EE cup, they become the focus of the transformation, rather than part of it.

3. Body expansion, particularly weight gain. If the girl becomes more pudgy or greater, it belongs in the Body Expansion forum area. Breasts and "junk in the trunk" is an exception, but only to J'Lo proportions.

4. Growth past 6' 3" or so. Anything past that belongs in the Growth forum area.

5. Amazonian transformation (which I am a fan of). Increased beauty can include becoming athletic, but if the girl looks like she might be able to arm wrestle The Rock, it belongs in Growth. (If the strength comes without added bulk, it does not count. She Hulk transformations definitely are considered amazonian.)

6. Bimbo transformations. Here we get into a gray area. Reason being, there is a thread FOR bimbo transformations. If the primary focus is on the intelligence drain or mental domination, then it belongs in the bimbo thread. If the primary focus is on the physical transformation, then it can come here. If the Bimbo transformation only includes makeup, dyed hair, and an IQ drop, don't put it here. But if a girl goes from a mousy, ugly geek to a smoking hot stacked bimbo, it probably belongs here.

7. Transgender. If a change in gender is part of the transformation, it shouldn't be included here, it belongs in the transgender area. If however, the target got turned into a girl first, THEN later got an increased beauty transformation, then the latter transformation qualifies.

8. A woman just putting on makeup or dying her hair. There should be some actual process.

Some things that make a transformation more likely to qualify as being here (so look out for them):

1. Multiple changes, if the target is getting a thin waist, and a nice set of boobs, and a nice ass, it likely belongs here.

2. Facial changes. One of the primary focuses of this thread.

3. Weight Loss. The Body Expansion people might think it a shame, but fat removal is one of the steps of increased beauty.

4. Hair changes. Long lustrous hair is another popular part of a beauty transformation, but it should definitely be accompanied by other transformations.

5. Sudden interest from men. If guys are suddenly dropping their jaws at the girl, it likely belongs here.

6. Physical imperfections removed. Glasses, pimples, leg hair, all removed, skin becoming soft, nails becoming well manicured, etc.

These are the kinds of things that indicate a good increased beauty transformation.


A little note concerning age change: The target age of the end result should be 18-35. Age progression to that area should probably be in the AR/AP area, but an age regression to 18-35 years old may be a good one to put here, particularly if the age regression includes enhancement beyond what they had when they WERE that age.

Any comments or suggestions?

Last edited by Shadowsbane99; 09-28-2008 at 07:20 PM. Reason: Indentation
Shadowsbane99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2008   #216
Very_Good_Karma
Likes Happy Endings
 
Very_Good_Karma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 188
Re: More general 'increased beauty'

The post is a bit jumbled but I think you've summed it up nicely. (Add some indents, white space and bolding. It's verging on tldr.)

I like the last category a lot. "Multiple Changes", "Facial Changes" and "Removal Of Imperfections" are especially great hallmarks. I'd add "Limited Degree of Transformation" as IB transformations tend to be relatively subtle, because (as you said) if they take any one attribute too far they belong in another category.

Actually, it's quite possible to imagine an IB story where a character achieves Glamour Overload and people that look upon them are automatically enthralled. But then again, if it goes that far it's really more Mind Control. So yeah, IB is all about balance and moderation.

Are there any other terms this has been going by? I used to see writers who explicitly included Butt Growth in their BE stories while keeping waists narrow self-label their work as "Hourglass". Do we even have a name for waist narrowing?

Personally I think IB is an excellent term, as it covers a broad range of transformations and is an unused abbreviation. (I really get sick of seeing HG, HG, HG, BE, BE, and BE all used at once on story sites.)
__________________



Musical Process: The Process Forum Soundtrack

Last edited by Very_Good_Karma; 09-28-2008 at 12:10 AM.
Very_Good_Karma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.