![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
TaylorMadeClips.com
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 924
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
__________________
TaylorMade BE Clips ******** TaylorMadeClips
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,920
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
Taylor, one of these days you should invest in a nice stadicam rig. It would really help improve the professional look of your clips to not have it shaking around so much all the time. A nice, stady camera angle with the ability to crane and pan without all the tiny shakes and judders would do wonders for your production values, I think.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
hmmmm
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 191
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
Quote:
I don't think anyone has ever told us we needed to upgrade our production values. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,920
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
Even a steady hand can't compare to a good gyro-stabilized waist-mounted rig. As much as I like your clips it's obvious to anyone that it's just a guy/girl holding a camera in their hands, especially whenever there's any kind of significant movement.
And fair enough, no one's ever said your production values were poor, but by the same token has anyone ever said they were great? Let's be honest here, no one expects great production values from fetish material- but if it had it, wouldn't that create that much more buzz? I mean, your prosthetics have greatly improved over the years- why not do the same for the camerawork? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
hmmmm
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 191
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Shooting camera is a skill and its one that Taylor is excellent at. Fluid tracking shots & pans are stylistic choices--not artistic improvements in their own right. Consider this... even though we try to get the best acting out of our models through coaching, directing and editing we still end up with our share of wooden actresses. How much more painful would it be with rock-steady, gliding camera movements capturing every nuance of the stilted & awkward performance? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,920
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
Hey, if you're happy where you are, then more power to you, I guess. I was just always taught that "Good enough", well, isn't. I was just observing that everything else seems to be on the up and up with the site- just figured it might be time to upgrade the gear to that next level, as it's one of the few areas that could stand some improvement. Aside from, as you mentioned, the occasionally wooden acting, but it's a lot easier to find a steadicam rig than girls that are into this sort of thing I'd wager.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
If you ever feel the need to do so, you can make a low end one with about $10 worth of PVC pipe.
__________________
I drink mercury... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,920
|
Re: TaylorMadeClips's Body Expansion Thread
Er, no, you can't. At least not one that will signifcantly reduce the shakes and twitches of the screen...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|