|
|
|
10-09-2012
|
#1 |
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 341
|
Re: Alice In Wonderland
I don't like the non-process stuff anymore than anyone else. In fact, I hate it. Nothing worse than a title that starts with "No Process BUT..." If it were up to me that would never happen.
However there has been a long standing acceptance of implied process, and depending on what the stills or the video looks like, a giant Alice rammed into a room would certainly fall under the implied category. |
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#2 |
|
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,305
|
Re: Alice In Wonderland
I saw it finally, it wasn't worth it
 The guy who won did like a small hallway and room, and an oversized but really didn't sell the transitions inbetween. The woman who lost did such artsy crap you couldn't even tell what scale the Alice was supposed to be The Actress was kind of hot and did well sell the scale changes. A waste of time, sorry 
|
|
|
|
|
10-16-2012
|
#3 | |
|
One pill makes you larger
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 150
|
Re: Alice In Wonderland
Quote:
Doesn't seem like that big a deal honestly. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012
|
#4 |
|
MacroTessaClaustroPhile
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 542
|
Re: Alice In Wonderland
Just thought I'd post this.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012
|
#5 |
|
Process Fan
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 39
|
Re: Alice In Wonderland
Wow that is a nice one! Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2012
|
#6 |
|
Process Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 346
|
Re: Alice In Wonderland
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
